I used to believe that the world essentially divided into two types of people: those who were broadly tolerant, and those who felt threatened by differences. If only the former ruled the earth, I reasoned, the world might know some measure of peace. But there was a problem with my theory, and it was never clearer than in a conversation I had with a Pakistani friend who told me that he loathed people like George Bush who insisted on dividing the world into "us" and "them". My friend did not realise that he was in fact falling straight into the camp of people he loathed.
This is a political version of a famous paradox formulated by Bertrand Russell. The stronger you insist on the necessity of tolerance, the more intolerant you become toward those who disagree. The moral lesson is that there is no such thing as unqualified tolerance; ultimately, one must be able to expound intolerance of certain ideologies without surrendering the moral high ground normally linked to tolerance. Read More.
A blog concerning Christianity, the Church, Politics, Current Events, and anything else that strikes my fancy!
Wednesday, September 19, 2007
The death of relativism
Interesting:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
The main stream media was all ears when Casey Sheehan's Mom was speaking. Wonder is Daniel Pearl's Mom will be quoted and touted as much with these comments.
Post a Comment