Read this and think, what if there were religious persecution in this country? Seems we have plenty as it is.
Commentary » Blog Archive » Obama’s Enlightened Choice
Commentary » Blog Archive » Obama’s Enlightened Choice
President Obama — in an inspired move — named Dr. Francis Collins head of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Collins is one of the world’s leading scientists. He is a physician-geneticist known in part for his landmark discoveries of disease genes and for his leadership of the Human Genome Project. (Collins served as director of the National Human Genome Research Institute at the NIH from 1993-2008.)
The New York Times reports, however, that a couple of objections have been raised to the choice of Dr. Collins. According to the Times:
The first is his very public embrace of religion. Dr. Collins, who was not raised with any religious training, wrote a book called “The Language of God,” and he has given many talks and interviews in which he has described his conversion to Christianity as a 27-year-old medical school intern. “I came at this from a position of ignorance,” he said. “I came at it from an intellectual point of view.” Religion and genetic research have long had a fraught relationship, and some in the field are uneasy about what they see as Dr. Collins’s evangelism.
This is an example of the sometimes subtle and sometimes overt bias against people of religious faith. Collins’s critics speak as if Obama had named the President of Westminster Theological Seminary as head of NIH instead of one of the world’s greatest scientific minds and a man of sterling scientific credentials. Dr. Collins being a person of faith — and in particular, of the Christian faith — seems to alarm some people in the scientific world, despite there being nothing in Colins’s body of work that would cause anyone to think twice about how his faith might negatively impact his work at NIH. The mere fact that Collins embraced Christianity and is viewed as an “evangelical” is itself considered grounds for suspicion.
Related articles by Zemanta:
1 comment:
At least the Dems are consistent in their aversion to those of religious faiths.
I suppose that people should be more like President Obama who seems to want to hide his faith under a bushel basket. He wants to represent all faiths and all people by appearing faithless and separate from all.
What are President Obama's principles? Why does he feel so compelled to apologize for the US outside the US.
All of this is to say the least troubling.
Post a Comment